The Quiet Steel of BK Sharma IAS !!!

Biswanath Bhattacharya

May 31, 2026

I first came to Statistics not by accident but by instinct. When I was enrolled in B.Sc., I chose it as one of my subjects because numbers had never frightened me. Mathematics, to me, was not a jungle of symbols but a lantern: if one held it steadily enough, shadows moved aside and patterns began to breathe. I was young, hungry, and vain enough to believe that any problem could be subdued by patience. Yet Statistics was different. It was not merely arithmetic marching in straight lines; it was uncertainty given grammar, chance taught to wear logic like a disciplined robe. Probability, expectation, variation, deviation—these were not dry terms to me. They were the secret weather of life itself, the invisible arithmetic behind success and catastrophe, behind survival and loss. I entered that classroom thinking I was good at mathematics. I came out realizing that numbers could also wound, warn, and prophesy.

Our Statistics faculty, if memory serves me right, was not especially well equipped in those days. Professor A. K. Roy headed the department, and there were two others whose faces time has rubbed smooth in my mind. But one teacher remained, not as a name in a register, but as a living presence. Shri Birendra Krishna Sharma—BK Sharma to students, almost like a whispered credential—was officially a Demonstrator. Yet the title never contained him. Some men remain within their designation; others overflow it. He belonged to the second kind. He taught us with a severity that did not humiliate and a clarity that did not flatter. Under him, probability ceased to be a chapter and became a philosophy of existence. Expectation was no longer merely a formula but a measure of how much hope the world allows a man before collecting its debt. He moved through the intricacies of theory with such ease that one felt he was not explaining a subject but opening a locked room. Many lecturers instruct; a rare few awaken. BK Sharma awakened.

I even went once to his residence on Ramnagar Road No. 1, carrying with me the awkward reverence of a student who has not yet learned how close admiration can come to affection. A teacher’s house reveals a different truth than a classroom. There the voice that commands a blackboard must live among cups, curtains, bookshelves, and the soft negotiations of domestic life. Madam Sharma received me with a warmth that was almost disarming. She was exquisitely graceful, refined without effort, and she placed before me more delicacies than I deserved—snacks, sweets, tea, all offered with the kind of attention that makes a young visitor suddenly conscious of his own poverty of manners. She too was a teacher, and one could sense in that household a rare companionship of intellect and discipline. Yet I remember leaving with an ache I could not fully name. They had no children. Even then, young as I was, I felt that silence inside a house. Some absences do not cry aloud; they hover like a folded shawl in a corner, visible only if one has the heart to notice.

Years passed. College ended. Life, that ruthless clerk, closed one file and opened another. I met Sharma Sir again when he was serving as the Block Development Officer of Jirania Block. By then I was a Panchayat Extension Officer, and the year was 1980—a year etched into Tripura like a blade mark that never fades. By merit and sheer intellectual force, Sharma Sir had already distinguished himself. He had stood second in the Tripura Civil Service examination at his first attempt, while Alak Deb, a professor of Physics, stood first. In time both rose to the IAS, though promotions in those years often moved with the reluctance of a locked wheel. Governments can be strangely ungenerous to their own servants, as if efficiency were a habit to be exploited but not rewarded. Any administration that forgets its employees are also its human foundation becomes poorer in spirit, even when it calls itself powerful. Whatever one may say of differing regimes, a government must nourish its employees, not merely use them; they are, in a sense, its own children, and neglect breeds bitterness where loyalty should have grown.

The year 1980 was notorious in Tripura for the terrible ethnic violence between Bengalis and indigenous tribal communities, culminating in what history remembers as the Mandai massacre. The deeper wound had been forming for decades. After Partition and again after the 1971 war in what became Bangladesh, large refugee inflows changed Tripura’s demographic balance and sharpened old anxieties over land, power, memory, and belonging. Into that tinderbox stepped ambitious men with slogans in their mouths and fire in their pockets. I had known tribals closely. I had worked among them, spoken with them, eaten with them, watched their restraint, their honesty, their plain speech. I do not remember meeting among them the elaborate crookedness one so often encounters in the supposedly civilized world. Their simplicity was real—but that simplicity was also vulnerable. It could be stirred, used, redirected by those hungry for influence. A people can be brave and yet be manipulated; innocence does not protect a community from the designs of the cunning.

What happened at Mandai in June 1980 still stands as one of the darkest chapters in Tripura’s history. Published accounts describe how, after rising tension, arson, and panic in the surrounding areas, Bengalis living in vulnerable pockets fled toward roads, schools, and makeshift shelters. At Mandai, killings reached a scale so savage that even later retellings seem to recoil from themselves. Official counts placed the dead in the hundreds; other contemporary and retrospective accounts put the toll higher. Homes were burnt, families scattered, and a refugee crisis unfolded almost overnight. The violence did not remain confined to one point on the map; it spread fear across the state and left camps crowded with the displaced and the bereaved. The name Mandai ceased to be merely a place. It became a sound that carried smoke, rumor, blood, and disbelief together.

On the fateful day when the violence broke, I was supposed to go to Mandai. Fate, however, does not always arrive dressed as reason. My mother happened to be with me then by what I can only call divine accident. She looked at me with that grave authority only mothers possess and said, “Bishan, don’t go. I have dreamt something ominous.” She always called me Bishan. There are moments when a son obeys not because he understands, but because love has already decided for him. I did not go. Later, when news arrived in fragments—then in floods—I understood how close death had walked beside me that morning. Had I gone, I might not have returned. Some men are saved by strength, some by intelligence, and some by a mother’s unreasoning terror in the night. I have lived long enough to know that prophecy often enters a house barefoot.

And yet, even in that season of suspicion, I could not forget what I had seen of tribal humanity at close quarters. I drank in those days. One night, in a fit of restless craving, when no liquor—foreign or local—could be found anywhere, I crossed the river on foot and made my way to a tribal basti under darkness. They were frightened to see me. Perhaps I appeared like trouble itself emerging from the riverbed. But fear did not make them cruel. They gave me their country-made drink, chuak, and I swallowed a bottle with the gratitude of a desperate man. They did more than that: they kept watch over me through the entire night, guarded me while I slept under their uncertain mercy, and in the morning escorted me back to the river with five bottles of chuak. They stopped at the bank and did not cross. That memory has never left me. It stands in my mind like a lamp in a corridor of horror—a reminder that communities do not kill; hatred does. Ordinary people, when left to their own conscience, are often far kinder than the politics done in their name.

Then came the camps—thousands of homeless Bengali refugees uprooted by terror, stripped not only of property but of the ordinary dignity of routine. I was made officer in charge of one such camp. In theory, relief work is an instrument of mercy. In practice, where hunger gathers, corruption circles like vultures. I discovered very soon that I could not command the machinery around me as I wanted. Leakages, manipulations, vested hands—everything that should have gone straight to the distressed seemed forever threatened by invisible theft. I was not made for that compromise. I told Sharma Sir that if possible I should be relieved of the responsibility, because I could not control the rampant corruption and did not wish to preside over a theatre of helplessness. He understood at once. That was one of his gifts: he knew the difference between incapacity and conscience. He saw reason where others might have seen refusal, and he moved me to a less important post. In doing so he spared me the daily humiliation of witnessing misery administered by dishonesty.

Much of crisis management in those brutal days depended not only on orders issued from above but on the nerve, speed, and judgment of officers on the ground. Contemporary accounts of the Mandai violence mention the BDO of Jirania opening relief arrangements for fleeing refugees and urgently reporting the worsening situation to district authorities as the killings spread. That administrative steel matters. Statistics may count the dead, but governance is tested by how it protects the living. I remember feeling then that men like Sharma Sir carried not merely files but the moral burden of the state. Later he would serve at higher levels, rise into the IAS, and become associated with major political and administrative transitions in Tripura, including the period of Sudhir Ranjan Majumdar’s government. Such men often become bridges between rival camps because competence is one language even adversaries understand. He also earned a reputation for helping fellow officers and guiding careers that might otherwise have stalled in neglect. In public life, patronage is common, but generous mentorship is rare.

Today, when I think of BK Sharma, I do not think first of rank, promotion, or post. I think of a man who began as a Demonstrator and taught as if ideas mattered; a man whose home held grace and an unspoken sorrow; a man who stood in a season of blood and displacement without surrendering either urgency or decency. Tripura has a way of forgetting some of its finest public servants while rewarding louder, smaller men. Vested interests rewrite memory. Parties praise loyalty and neglect character. Regimes change, slogans change, portraits on the wall change—but oblivion remains a patient conspirator. Yet certain figures survive erasure because they inhabit the recollections of those who saw them at close range. BK Sharma survives there for me: not merely as an officer, not merely as a teacher, not merely as an administrator who rose high, but as a quiet steel moving through a frightened time. The world remembers riots for their flames. I remember, too, the men who walked through those flames carrying order in one hand and humanity in the other.

Yet history is often unkind to its quiet heroes.

BK Sharma became a folklore figure—spoken of in fragments, remembered in fading stories, and slowly erased from the official narrative. Institutions forget those who do not shout.

But I remember.

I remember the man who taught me that probability is not just about numbers, but about survival. That expectation is not merely a calculation, but a fragile hope. That governance, like statistics, is an imperfect science—yet it must strive for balance.

And above all, I remember the silence in his house, the absence that perhaps shaped his compassion for others.

For in the arithmetic of life, some variables are never solved.

আরও পড়ুন...