|
Introduction: Hinterland of South West coastal region of
India, the traditional rubber belt, has reached saturation level
in area coverage; and all one may try there is to enhance
productivity. That, however, will not be enough. Rubber is a
versatile strategic raw material. Its demand both domestic and
global has been growing much too faster than increments in
| |
|
|
| |
 |
|
| |
|
|
production. Thailand and Malaysia, two major producers, are
likely to export less of it as years roll by owing to their
rapid industrial growth. For India, which is taking giant leaps
in the industries sector, its non-traditional area for rubber
cultivation is now in focus. North East India is emerging as one
of the most important rubber-growing zones outside the
traditional belt, and the scope is enormous. Governments and the
people of North East India should leave no stones unturned to
seize this unique opportunity for economic emancipation.
2. Agro climatic requirement
2.1. General: Commercial Rubber tree, Hevea brasiliensis grows
wild in the Amazon basin and adjacent areas of Brazil. Important
climatic requirements within the tropics for commercial
cultivation of rubber generally are well-distributed high
rainfall with no pronounced droughts; mild and short winter,
high humidity and free from strong and prolonged seasonal winds.
2.2. Ideal: Climate, physiography and soil for optimum growth
and yield for rubber may be briefly described as below:
|
Rainfall: |
Annual- 2000-3000 mm; evenly distributed. |
|
Temperature: |
210
- 350
C |
|
Humidity: |
70 to 95 % throughout the year |
|
Wind: |
Strong seasonal winds for prolonged periods
lead to stunted growth of young trees. Severe storms snap
and uproot mature trees. |
|
Elevation: |
Below 450 m above MSL |
|
Slope: |
Gently undulating topography with slope
between 50
to 150 |
|
Water table: |
Well below 100 cm |
|
Soil: |
Depth 100 cm or more; well drained & of
medium texture |
2.3. Adaptability: Rubber is adaptable to a wide range of
agro-climatic conditions. Deviation in respect of rainfall,
temperature, humidity and wind affect growth and yield, but the
adverse impact from variations to a limit can in most cases be
moderated through management intervention. That it is so is
demonstrated by the generally good performance of rubber in
Tripura and elsewhere in the Northeast.
3. Major rubber growing regions of the world Rubber has been
predominantly grown in two major types of tropical climate:
a. Equatorial monsoon climate: The region between 100 North and
South latitude comprising most of the Indonesian archipelago,
Malaysia, southern parts of Sri Lanka and some other islands
b. Dry and wet monsoon climate: The Indian Subcontinent,
Northern Sri Lanka, coastal Bangladesh, Burma, Thailand,
Vietnam, Philippine archipelago and Southeastern Indonesia.
4. Rubber in India, Kerala dominates: European planters
introduced commercial cultivation of rubber in 1902 at Thattakad
in the erstwhile Travancore State. It has been traditionally
cultivated since then largely in Kerala and Kanyakumari District
of Tamilnadu, which receive abundant precipitation from of both
the southwest and northeast monsoons. Non-traditional areas
found suitable for rubber cultivation despite varying degrees of
limitations are hinterland of coastal Karnataka, Goa, Konkan
region of Maharashtra, coastal Andhra Pradesh and Orissa,
Siliguri area of West Bengal and the low elevation regions of
the
Northeastern states excluding Sikkim. Out of 615,000 ha of
rubber plantation in the country, Kerala alone accounts for
502,000 ha.
5. Rubber in NE India
5.1. Large-scale planting of rubber commenced in the Northeast
in 1963 with plantations in degraded forestland in Tripura as a
soil conservation initiative. Soil conservation departments of
Mizoram, Meghalaya and Assam took to planting rubber near about
the same time. Low elevation regions of the Northeast, with the
sole exception of Sikkim, with near tropical climatic features
soon emerged as the principal rubber growing zone outside the
traditional belt in the country, with Tripura turning out to be
the second largest rubber growing state in India.
5.2. Area breakup: State wise break up of area coverage till
2006-07 against potential area determined after exploratory
survey by the Rubber Board and other agencies like the National
Bureau of Soil Survey and Land use Planning is as below:
|
State |
Geographical area
(km2 ) |
Target for rubber
(ha) |
Area planted
(ha) |
Coverage
(%) |
|
Arunachal Pradesh |
83743 |
25,000 |
445 |
1.8 |
|
Assam |
78438 |
200,000 |
15850 |
7.9 |
|
Manipur |
22327 |
10,000 |
1862 |
18.6 |
|
Meghalaya |
22429 |
50,000 |
5570 |
11.1 |
|
Mizoram |
22081 |
50,000 |
519 |
1.0 |
|
Nagaland |
16579 |
15,000 |
2574 |
17.2 |
|
Sikkim |
7096 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Tripura |
10486 |
100,000 |
35760 |
35.8 |
|
Total |
263179 |
450,000 |
62580 |
13.9 |
5.3. NEC sets target for expansion:
3rd Summit and Special meeting of the North Eastern Council
(NEC) in March 2007 considered the need for doubling the area
under rubber in the NE over a period of 10 years from 2007-08,
and the Rubber Board accordingly prepared a project report for
planting of rubber over 60,000 ha:
New planting of rubber proposed for
Northeast States (ha)
|
State |
XI Plan |
XII Plan |
Total |
|
Tripura |
12400 |
16250 |
28650 |
|
Assam |
6700 |
10000 |
16700 |
|
Meghalaya |
2725 |
3750 |
6475 |
|
Nagaland |
1050 |
1500 |
2550 |
|
Manipur |
650 |
1000 |
1650 |
|
Mizoram |
625 |
1000 |
1625 |
|
Arunachal Pradesh |
850 |
1500 |
2350 |
|
Total |
25000 |
35000 |
60000 |
The target is proposed to be
achieved through Block plantation, a special programme for
economic rehabilitation of tribal people in NE and through
corporate and individual growers. Rubber Board implemented the
Block Plantation scheme during the Xth Plan in Tripura with 50%
contribution from the State Government, 43% from Rubber Board
and 7% from beneficiaries. This scheme is proposed to be
extended to Assam, Arunachal Pradesh and Meghalaya during the
XIth Plan period.
6. Rubber in Tripura
6.1. Initiation: Rubber plantation was raised for the first time
in Tripura in 1963 by the State Forest Department. Rubber
| |
|
|
| |
 |
|
| |
|
|
Board
responded by opening its first (one-man) office in NE at
Agartala in 1967. Tripura Forest Development & Plantation
Corporation Ltd. (TFDPC), a State Government Undertaking
established in 1976, adopted rehabilitation of degraded forests
through rubber plantation as its primary objective. The State
Government transferred 10,000 ha of degraded forestland on a
long-term lease to TFDPC for raising rubber plantation. Rubber
Board up graded its one-man set up at Agartala to a Regional
office in 1979 for extension and training.
6.2. Tripura Forest Development & Plantation Corporation Ltd (TFDPC)
a. Largest Rubber Plantation Unit: It is a premier profit
earning public sector company of the Government of Tripura and
is the largest rubber plantation unit in the country with more
than 11000 ha of rubber plantation. The Latex Processing factory
of TFDPC produces annually around 1000 MT of high value Cenex
(latex concentrate) and other by-products.
b. Rubber wood: TFDPC commissioned a Rubber Timber Processing
Unit in 1999 at Negicherra near Agartala with financial
assistance from the Indian Council for Forest Research &
Education. Its capacity was gradually increased from 500 cum per
annum to the current level of 2000 cum. Treated rubber wood from
the unit has a ready market now and the demand has been rising.
A Furniture Manufacturing facility was set up in the unit and it
has been producing high-end as well as utility furniture for
schools on a fairly large-scale. A Common Facility Centre for
automatic semi knock down furniture for producing world-class
furniture is now on the anvil.
c. Rehabilitation through rubber: TFDPC implemented a project
for rehabilitation of 100 tribal shifting cultivators through
rubber plantation at its Warangbari Plantation Centre in West
Tripura under a centrally sponsored scheme. The families worked
on payment of wages for establishment of their own plantation
with the hope of a good earning from sale of latex on maturity.
The project caught the imagination of the planners as well
beneficiaries. The Warangbari experience was the precursor for
establishment of another public sector undertaking, Tripura
Rehabilitation Plantation Corporation Ltd. (TRPC) in 1983. It
was set up with the primary objective of economic rehabilitation
of tribal shifting cultivators, tribal landless and small
farmers mainly through rubber plantation. This rehabilitation
model was utilized mutatis mutandis by the Tribal Welfare
Department, Tripura Tribal Areas Autonomous District Council (TTAADC)
and finally by the Rubber Board in its highly acclaimed Block
Plantation scheme.
6.3. TRPC in tribal rehabilitation on rubber plantation:
6.3.1. Funding of plantations: Creation of plantation during the
first phase of TRPC project was supported by bank loan of
Rs.75.66 lakh under NABARD refinance scheme. 1064 ha of rubber
plantation was raised with that loan for 709 beneficiaries
during 1983-84 to 1987-88. The entire loan with interest was
paid back. A loan of Rs.173.82 lakh received under the World
Bank Aided Rubber Project was utilized for raising 924 ha of
rubber plantation for 720 beneficiaries during 1993-94 to
2000-01. Rs.247.78 lakh against the principal amount and
interest was repaid and the disputed claim for an additional
repayment of Rs.42.58 lakh was referred to an Arbitrator. The
plantations for rehabilitation of tribal, for rest of the time,
were funded under the annual plan schemes of the Tribal Welfare
Department, Rural Development or Tripura Tribal Areas Autonomous
District Council.
6.3.2. The plantations: TRPC created 6079 ha of rubber
plantation since 1984 season for 4945 tribal beneficiaries. The
plantations raised initially had in general rather a limited
success rate. There were cases of desertion and large majority
of the failed areas fell victims to grazing and fire from
shifting cultivation areas. Certain plantations were abandoned
due to problems of free access. The area actually maintained and
utilized in 2006-07 was 4509 ha. The picture changed rather fast
after some beneficiaries started earning from sale of latex to
TRPC. They found the job of tapping much less strenuous compared
to farm labour or shifting cultivation, and that the engazement
was at the most for two hours a day for a single member of the
family was an added attraction.
a. Average earning of TRPC
beneficiaries against supply of latex & scrap
|
Year |
Area tapped (ha) |
Benef-
iciaries |
Produ-ction (MT) |
Sale proceeds (Rs./lakh) |
Paid to benef-iciaries |
Average per beneficiary
(Rs./pa) |
|
2003-04 |
921 |
1335 |
917 |
491 |
270 |
20,250/- |
|
2004-05 |
1044 |
1396 |
1036 |
474 |
363 |
25,989/- |
|
2005-06 |
1182 |
1514 |
1585 |
930 |
507 |
33,458/- |
|
2006-07 |
1264 |
1564 |
1828 |
1176 |
950 |
60,758/- |
The table shows a quantum jump
compared to Rs.10,000/- per annum that a family of five in
Tripura could expect to earn in cash and kind from shifting
cultivation and that too after backbreaking labour of the entire
family.
b. Productivity level in rehabilitation plantations under
TRPC
|
Year: |
2003-04 |
2004-05 |
2005-06 |
2006-07 |
National av. |
|
Production per ha
(Block) in kg: |
996 |
992 |
1341 |
1446 |
1879 |
6.4. Rubber, the most important
Plantation crop in Tripura: Rubber has now attained the status
of the most important plantation crop in Tripura not merely
because of its commercial success, but more so due to its
innovative application for economic rehabilitation of shifting
cultivators, which delivered generally a degree of success in a
manner hitherto not experienced in any rehabilitation package on
un-arable uplands.
6.5. Rubber for economic rehabilitation of tribal communities
in Tripura Area in ha
|
Agency |
Till 31/03/2006 |
2006-07 |
Target 2007-08 |
|
Area |
Beneficiary |
Area |
Beneficiary |
TFDPC
|
2915 |
2413 |
247 |
247 |
160 |
|
TRPC |
3964 |
4367 |
545 |
578 |
600 |
|
TTAADC |
1521 |
NA |
0 |
0 |
300 |
|
Block Plantation by Rubber
Board |
3047 |
2651 |
204 |
204 |
150 |
|
Total: |
11447 |
9431+ |
996 |
1029 |
3209 |
6.6. Agency wise break up of
Plantation in Tripura as in March 2007
|
|
Agency
|
Area in ha |
|
1. |
TFDPC |
11344 |
|
2. |
TRPC |
4509 |
|
3. |
Block Plantation |
3251 |
|
4. |
Individual growers |
12880 |
|
5. |
Others |
3776 |
|
|
Total: |
35760 |
It may be
mentioned that as per Rubber Board statistics (provisional) the
total area planted to rubber in Tripura till 2006-07 is 39,095
ha. The area of 35,760 ha shown above indicates the estimated
area actually maintained or utilized.
6.7. Rubber area & production in
Tripura
Of the total 35760 ha of rubber plantation in the state, 11500
ha was under tapping during 2006-07 producing around 20,000 MT
of raw rubber. A dateline is shown hereunder:
|
Particulars |
|
|
|
21st January 1972(Statehood
day) |
March 1998 |
March 2007 |
|
Area under rubber |
103 ha |
25780 ha |
35760 ha |
|
Area under tapping |
0 |
11500 ha |
19958 ha |
|
Annual production |
0 |
10000 MT |
20000 MT |
6.8. Productivity: Productivity rose
from 200 to 300 kg per ha per annum during 1970s to the present
average of 1000 kg plus per ha per annum against the national
average of 1879 kg. Some better-managed plantations in the state
have reached production of 1800 kg per ha per annum. Around
35000 ha will be under tapping five years hence with an annual
production of upwards of 35000 MT of raw rubber in the state.
6.9. Utilisation of rubber produced
in Tripura
Around 18000 MT out of the total
production of 20,000 MT of rubber during 2006-07 was sold to
traders based in Kolkata and Guwahati. There is scope and
potential for establishment within the next 3-4 years of a
medium sized manufacturing unit for bi-cycle and scooter tires
in the state.
6.10. Tripura Rubber
Mission-
Nodal Agency for rubber sector in Tripura
Tripura Rubber Mission (Mission)
was constituted in January 2006 by the Government of Tripura as
an interdepartmental coordinating body headed by Dr. VK
Bahuguna, Additional Principal Chief Conservator of Forests,
Tripura with the object to increase the coverage under rubber
cultivation in Tripura to 85,094 ha during 2006-07 to 2025-26
and to ensure scientific management of rubber plantation for
sustainable development. The Mission has the mandate for
planning and coordination and to organise funding, capacity
building and monitoring to achieve the Mission target.
Area
dedicated to rubber plantation in Tripura in 2005 was 33220 ha,
and out of that maintainable area was 29120 ha. Mission’s Action
Plan envisaged further extension of rubber plantation over 51894
ha to reach 85094 ha in twenty years from 2006-07:
a.
Degraded forestland:
26874 ha
b.
Non-forest land
including private holdings: 25000 ha
Total:
51874 ha
6.11.
Chase the target but with caution
The Mission
decided to proceed with caution in pursuing the ambitious target
for expansion of rubber in Tripura with due regards to both
ecological considerations, on which the debate is still alive,
and the demand on the limited land for alternative productive
use, e.g. for medicinal & aromatic plants, bamboo, horticulture,
nature tourism, etc. etc.
7. Institutional issues associated
with rubber in NE region
7.1. Minimalist presence of Rubber
Board
NEC and
Rubber Board intend to double the area under rubber in the NE
over a period of 10 years from 2007-08. Rubber Board’s
establishment and presence in the NE region is, however,
inadequate to support the activity even at Xth Plan
level. The Board has only 9 regional offices, 3 for the 4
districts of Tripura and 6 for the rest of the Northeast, scanty
by any reckoning. Strong extension support is essential for
cultivation and management of a sophisticated crop like rubber,
and more so in a remote non-traditional zone like NE. The number
of field level Extension Officers in the NE region actually came
down from 41 in 1997 to 24 in 2007. Substantial strengthening of
the Board’s extension & training facilities as well as R&D would
be essential for the proposed extension of scientific rubber
cultivation in this remote non-traditional belt.
7.2. Financial assistance from
Rubber Board
Cost of
raising and maintenance of rubber plantation till maturity for
Tripura, Assam and Meghalaya at Rs.73,100/-, Rs.88,970/- and
Rs.100,770/- respectively are very high. Assistance for new
planting during the Xth Plan were too low as below:
Planting grant:
For holdings up to 5 ha -
Rs.20,000/- per ha
For
holdings above 5 ha and up to 20 ha- Rs.16,000/-
Cost of planting material:
Rs.8/- per plant (maximum Rs.4000/- per ha)
There is a
proposal to raise the planting grant to Rs.22000/- per ha and to
provide Rs.4000/- per ha for transportation of plantation in
puts. It would be difficult to achieve the ambitious target of
60000 ha unless the subsidy level is raised to 50% of costs.
Production of rubber would meet a strategic need for the
country’s rapid industrialization. More over the returns from
rubber plantations in the NE region would be substantially lower
than that from the traditional areas for a variety of reasons
including climate. State Governments of the NE region may under
the circumstances take up the matter with the Government of
India for enhancement of subsidy to 50% of costs for rapid
expansion of rubber in the region.
7.3.Training facilities
|